Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #1186Re: Nitro
From: Eric P. Scott
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 06:01
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 06:01
15 lines
1159 bytes
1159 bytes
In article <1anj1tINNkjg@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> rhino@eeap.cwru.edu (Carlin E. Wiegner) writes: >ADB compatibility is good because it allows NeXT users to use alot >of Macintosh products which are generally cheaper. If NeXT stuck >with their non-standard keyboard architecture it would have been >awhile before we see graphics tablets and all the other great >input devices that have appeared on the macintosh. Like... COPY PROTECTION DONGLES??? BTW, I'm not aware of any current support for ADB graphics tablets. Serial varieties have worked since 2.0 days, and 3.0 understands pressure sensitivity. -=EPS=-
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct5.060105.20925@csus.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!newsReferences:
<dillon.0oq2@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <1992Oct4.133355.861@next.cambridge.ma.us> <1992Oct4.190419.19772@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> <1anj1tINNkjg@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!news From: eps@futon.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott) Subject: Re: Nitro Message-ID: <1992Oct5.060105.20925@csus.edu> Sender: news@csus.edu Reply-To: eps@cs.sfsu.edu Organization: San Francisco State University References: <dillon.0oq2@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <1992Oct4.133355.861@next.cambridge.ma.us> <1992Oct4.190419.19772@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> <1anj1tINNkjg@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 06:01:05 GMT Lines: 15