Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #1210Re: Nitro
From: Ben Mehlman
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 17:50
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 17:50
22 lines
1672 bytes
1672 bytes
In article <1992Oct4.133355.861@next.cambridge.ma.us>
simsong@next.cambridge.ma.us (Simson L. Garfinkel) writes:
> I don't know where you guys are getting this "Nitro" name from.
It's the name that at least one of the NeXT sales force is using to
identify the machine. Whether the name originated at NeXT or in the rumor
mill is academic at this point (although I'd be curoius to know what NeXT
DOES intend to call the machine upon release)...
The increase from 33 Mhz to 40 Mhz (apporx 20%): I agree it is not a big
breakthrough. But it will zip up performance a bit, putting a better face
on the NeXT as it comes under the glare of publicity from those who may
not judge the technology as fairly as we do. For the same (marketing)
reasons, 40 Mhz is much better than 33. The average Mr. MIS sees 40 Mhz
as hot stuff, 33 as old technology. Forget electronics here. Since when
did marketing and reality have anything in common.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\|/ Ben Mehlman Indigo..
^ ^ Trirex Systems Inc
# # bmehlman@trirex.com Indigoing..
@
\___/ >NeXTMail Welcome< Indigone.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct5.175058.5438@Trirex.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newshost!rootReferences:
<1992Oct4.133355.861@next.cambridge.ma.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newshost!root From: bmehlman@trirex.com(Ben Mehlman) Subject: Re: Nitro Message-ID: <1992Oct5.175058.5438@Trirex.COM> Sender: root@Trirex.COM (Operator) Reply-To: bmehlman@trirex.com Organization: Trirex Systems Inc. References: <1992Oct4.133355.861@next.cambridge.ma.us> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 17:50:58 GMT Lines: 22