Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #1619Re: Penril Alliance V.34bis Feedback
From: Kurt Marko
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 1996 18:20
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 1996 18:20
36 lines
2556 bytes
2556 bytes
In article <DKJ0GI.7F9@eskimo.com>, Marc Salvatori <salvo@eskimo.com> wrote: >I am giving serious thought to acquiring a Penril Alliance V.34bis modem for >an AMI Enterprise IV EISA system running NeXTStep, which frequently accesses >an ISP in the Great NorthWest. How well has this modem worked for you? How >satisfied are you with Penril's service support? I've had a pair of Penril Alliance v.34's for a few weeks and so far have been underwhelmed by their performance. Despite the raving review in Network Computing, I've yet to get as good of performance from the Penrils as USR Couriers or Motorola v.3400s. I'm running NT 3.51 RAS on both ends. My first disappointment was that I had to cobble together the RAS modem.inf script for the Penril myself, since their tech support couldn't even spell RAS. My test setup is between virtually identical machines at home and work. With a v.3400 on the work end and a v.3400 or Courier v.everything at home I consistently (95+% of the time) yet 28.8 connections. With the Penril on the work end, I consistently get 26.4 connections; with either the v.3400, USR or Penril on the home side. Often, going Penril to Penril, after an initial 26.4 connection, it will rate shift up to 28.8, and sometimes back down to 26.4 again. I've _never_ gotten over 28.8 going Penril to Penril, even though they have the latest v.34+ (or whatever it's called) firmware, which is capable of up to 33.6. I get similar results when dialing from a Penril to a USR Total Control modem (essentially a Courier), running RAS; and when connecting to Compuserve's v.34 lines; i.e. the USR or Motorola connect at 28.8, the Penril at 26.4. Thus my Penril performance has been poor and I'm disappointed to not see any advantages from the v.34+ features, even though I've got excellent line quality between my test sites (as witnessed by the high percentage of 28.8 connections). The other disadvantage of the Penril is that it's _huge_; roughly 11"x11"x3"H (or 3x the size of a USR Sportster). Sorry to rain on the parade, but that's my experience so far. Kurt Marko
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4cjq64$ldk@hpbs2500.boi.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!hpbs2500.boi.hp.com!kmarkoReferences:
<DKJ0GI.7F9@eskimo.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!hpbs2500.boi.hp.com!kmarko From: kmarko@boi.hp.com (Kurt Marko) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware,comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Penril Alliance V.34bis Feedback Date: 5 Jan 1996 18:20:52 GMT Organization: Hewlett-Packard Client Computing Message-ID: <4cjq64$ldk@hpbs2500.boi.hp.com> References: <DKJ0GI.7F9@eskimo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: hpbs654.boi.hp.com Keywords: penril unix NeXTStep