Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #388110 bashing (was Re: M68060 Update)
From: Stuart Ritchie
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 09:03
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 09:03
14 lines
1209 bytes
1209 bytes
In article <1992Oct26.220702.2741@cubetech.com> andrew@cubetech.com writes: >88110 is bad news. I would bet that the 88110 is the last of the 88k. And it's probably this kind of negative generalization that's going to kill it. >P5. Pretty good chip. Will be cheaper than all the others due to the >sheer volume in which it will sell. I don't think this is a given... only one company is making it. But's that the same for most of the others. (P5, what's that?) Given how much technical information has been release about the Pentium, I can't see how it gets "Pretty good chip" and 88110 gets "bad news."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1cj0l0INNff1@stephen.cs.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!stephen.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mailReferences:
<1992Oct23.182717.145129@lexmark.com> <1c9h81INNccs@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> <1992Oct26.220702.2741@cubetech.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!stephen.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail From: sritchie@cs.ubc.ca (Stuart Ritchie) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware Subject: 88110 bashing (was Re: M68060 Update) Date: 27 Oct 1992 01:03:28 -0800 Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada Lines: 15 Message-ID: <1cj0l0INNff1@stephen.cs.ubc.ca> References: <1992Oct23.182717.145129@lexmark.com> <1c9h81INNccs@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> <1992Oct26.220702.2741@cubetech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: stephen.cs.ubc.ca