Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #49Re: DESIGN for UPGRADES was (WHY NOT ADB UPGRADE??)
From: Remo Williams
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 19:07
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 19:07
40 lines
2174 bytes
2174 bytes
In article <1992Oct27.003825.20589@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>
robinc@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Delucca) writes:
>
>
> The real issue now is:
> Is Next going to honor their customers and offer an upgrade
Now you know how Cube owners with opticals feel.
The NeXT hardware division seems unable to provide design choices in their
hardware that plan adequately for the future directions.
1) The optical.
2) NeXTDimension (can you say ccube?)
3) ADB.
4) DSP (Will this die NeXT?).
Makes you wonder what will be orphaned when/if NRW is announced/ships.
I certainly applaud forward momentum--the question is what is NeXT's strategy
for its existing customer base? What is the impetus for purchasing a NeXT if
you know you will be orphaned in 3-6 months from purchase with NO ability to
migrate to the new systems? Why not modularize the hardware design so that one
could slide in a new CPU chip, new I/O {faster ethernet, serial ports, ADB
etc.}, new video subsystem, etc. That way when the inevitable new stuff comes
out I can upgrade my base hardware as appropriate. A slotted/socketed
motherboard if you will.
I hope Rich Page and company are pondering a strategy like this to keep the
hardware division competitive AND responsive to the customer base. Its either
that or just jump to the intel environment where this sort of thing is common.
I'd like to think his folks are just as smart in that arena if not smarter.
And while we are at it why no multiprocessor setup for the cube from NeXT? Its
got slots USE THEM.
--
David Williams -- dlw@atherton.com -- NeXTMail welcome
dlw@netcom.com -- NeXTMail welcome
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BwuIGA.E2@atherton.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!UB.com!athertn!usenetReferences:
<1992Oct27.003825.20589@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!UB.com!athertn!usenet From: dlw@atherton.com (Remo Williams) Subject: Re: DESIGN for UPGRADES was (WHY NOT ADB UPGRADE??) Message-ID: <BwuIGA.E2@atherton.com> Sender: usenet@atherton.com (News Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: excalibur Organization: Atherton Technology, Inc. References: <1992Oct27.003825.20589@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 19:07:15 GMT Lines: 40