Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #502Re: Mono Monitor Size: 17" or 16" or 15.5" ?
From: Stephen E. Halpin
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 14:55
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 14:55
43 lines
2928 bytes
2928 bytes
In article <Bu8ysE.Ku9@iat.holonet.net> bwilliam@iat.holonet.net (Bill Williams) writes: >>>>Can't be so. Mitsubishi makes a 35" monitor. > >I believe the unit you speak of is FOUR TIMES SMALLER THAN MINE!! >Explanation: when it was first announced (The Mitsubishi) I was willing to >spend the 4,000 dollars for it (REALLY) but was told it ONLY DISPLAYED >640*480 pixels!!!! My monitor is 1280*960 (my 24 inch Moniterm) and thus >has FOUR TIMES AS MUCH SCREEN AREA than the "older" 35 inch tube you claim >is bigger than mine (four times as less pixels) Seventh grade geometry wasnt your specialty eh? Area is height times width. The number of ways you choose to break up that fixed area does not change the area. As for 1280x960, youve still missed the 1280x1024 boat provided by PCs, which can be had on a fine 19" Sony monitor or a fine 21" NEC monitor. SGIs new RealityEngine does 1600x1280, though I dont know which monitor they use. Almost all modern workstations and quite a few X terminals run at 1280x1024. <<Stuff deleted>> >This 2048 by 2048 makes me disbelieve you if the current smalles trinitron >pel element for a tri-phoshor group is 0.25 millimeters horizontally and >(guessing) 0.4 millimeters vertically then for a vertical resolution of >your claimed 2048 pel elements would measure (2048*0.4 mm = > 32 inches!!!!) >Therefore either it is not a BRIGHT monitor using trinitron shadowmask, >else it is A MARKETING LIE AND A TOTAL MYTH. Youre making very bad assumptions. Sony demonstrated two nice monitors at the 1989 SIGRAPH conference. The first was the 2048x2048 monitor, the other was a 2048x1536 19" monitor. The former is used by airline controllers, the latter was a prototype to scope out interest. Another booth had a really nice fishtank shaped monitor and reel to reel video deck for displaying an beyond HDTV recording format of 1910x1024. There was also a projection booth there with a Sony set rendering 1280x1024 (from one of their NEWS workstations) on a 10 foot diagonal screen (yes, it was a multiscan system.) >I rest my case. Until I see otherwise, I still believe that I have the >worlds largest computer monitor. > >BWilliams You really should get out more often. SIGRAPH is held every year, and is a great place to learn whats really going on out there. -Steve
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep8.145527.23481@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!news!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!vsg1.dsg.dec.com!halpinReferences:
<1992Sep7.174828.312@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <Bu8ysE.Ku9@iat.holonet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!news!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!vsg1.dsg.dec.com!halpin From: halpin@vsg1.dsg.dec.com (Stephen E. Halpin) Subject: Re: Mono Monitor Size: 17" or 16" or 15.5" ? Message-ID: <1992Sep8.145527.23481@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> Sender: usenet@nntpd.lkg.dec.com (USENET News System) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation References: <1992Sep7.174828.312@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <Bu8ysE.Ku9@iat.holonet.net> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 14:55:27 GMT Lines: 43