🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #921

Re: New RISC workstations / 88110 demise

#921
From: Christopher Songer
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 20:09
19 lines
1377 bytes
eboltz@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Eric Scott Boltz) writes:
>This sucks for a few reasons:
...
>3. The NRW will be AS FAST AS A HIGH-END CLONE.

Just as a passing question:

And how does the fastest machine in NeXT's lineup today compare with 
a highend clone? (A: It's slower and more expensive.)

Next could do a heck of alot worse than commiting to Intel. Intel is
doing a pretty good job keeping up with the Risc revolution. They seem
to have about a year performance lag with the risc designs and this gap 
has held for the past several years (unlike Moto who keeps falling
further behind.) Plus: Intel has volume like no risc maker can hope to 
achieve in the next several years. This makes for cheap silicon and
that makes for cheaper machines.

-Chris
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Nov05.200924.147058@lexmark.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!lexmark!songer
References: <1992Nov2.154050.23454@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <1992Nov2.170741.2092@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <1992Nov3.210551.13433@utstat.uucp>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!lexmark!songer
From: songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer)
Subject: Re: New RISC workstations / 88110 demise
Message-ID: <1992Nov05.200924.147058@lexmark.com>
X-Disclaimer: These views are the poster's and not necessarily those of Lexmark
Keywords: RISC
Sender: usenet@lexmark.com (News Dude)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 9.51.7.57
Organization: Lexington, KY
References: <1992Nov2.154050.23454@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <1992Nov2.170741.2092@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <1992Nov3.210551.13433@utstat.uucp>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 20:09:24 GMT
Lines: 19