Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #921Re: New RISC workstations / 88110 demise
From: Christopher Songer
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 20:09
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 20:09
19 lines
1377 bytes
1377 bytes
eboltz@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Eric Scott Boltz) writes: >This sucks for a few reasons: ... >3. The NRW will be AS FAST AS A HIGH-END CLONE. Just as a passing question: And how does the fastest machine in NeXT's lineup today compare with a highend clone? (A: It's slower and more expensive.) Next could do a heck of alot worse than commiting to Intel. Intel is doing a pretty good job keeping up with the Risc revolution. They seem to have about a year performance lag with the risc designs and this gap has held for the past several years (unlike Moto who keeps falling further behind.) Plus: Intel has volume like no risc maker can hope to achieve in the next several years. This makes for cheap silicon and that makes for cheaper machines. -Chris
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov05.200924.147058@lexmark.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!lexmark!songerReferences:
<1992Nov2.154050.23454@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <1992Nov2.170741.2092@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <1992Nov3.210551.13433@utstat.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!lexmark!songer From: songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer) Subject: Re: New RISC workstations / 88110 demise Message-ID: <1992Nov05.200924.147058@lexmark.com> X-Disclaimer: These views are the poster's and not necessarily those of Lexmark Keywords: RISC Sender: usenet@lexmark.com (News Dude) Nntp-Posting-Host: 9.51.7.57 Organization: Lexington, KY References: <1992Nov2.154050.23454@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <1992Nov2.170741.2092@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <1992Nov3.210551.13433@utstat.uucp> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 20:09:24 GMT Lines: 19