🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Nov2.170423.11754@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> coco@cbnewsl.cb.att.com  
(felix.lugo) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov2.033627.16955@gagetalker.com> scotty@gagetalker.com  
(Scott Turner) writes:
|> | Let me start by saying that I am not being paid by _anyone_ to investigate
|> | ADB upgrades. It's just been crazy ol' me and no one has been conspiring
|> | with me to investigate ADB upgades. At no time did any NeXT employee
|> | knowingly assisted me in investigating ADB upgrades.
|> | 
|> | I have also been asked to state the following:
|> | 
|> 
|> 	- Who "asked" you to state what you wrote in the above message, NeXT?
|> 	  If so, is this to be taken as an official statement from them?  And
|> 	  if it is, why didn't they make this announcement sooner?
|> 
|> Inquiring mind wants to know!
Inquiring minds will just get to keep on not knowing.

I've been more than happy to share what I've learned about ADB. But I would
like to beta test NS486 and I'm not interested in engaging in a messy battle
about the kind of email I've been getting from next.com.

'Nuff said.

And no, I'm not an offical spokesperson for NeXT.

But again, there are no upgrades for unblessed machines. Getting an unblessed
machine upgraded is alot like stroking a cat's fur backwards. There's alot
of hissing, wiggling, and mental anguish involved.

So if you want to watch NeXT hiss and wiggle please don't tell them I talked
you into it. Please tell them the devil made you do it. :)

But there are things underway that may make NeXT irrelevent in the ADB
upgrade picture. Which will probably make NeXT quite happy. So stay tuned.

Scotty