🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi folks, I don't have the tools or skill to make this myself.
Neither does Altex Electronics.  They tried, according to the man zs
page pinout scheme which I paste below... but failed.

NeXT 68030 to NeXT 68040 Cable (Null-modem cable)
     NeXT 68040 to Some RS-422 Devices (Null-modem cable)

     Mini-Din        Mini-Din
     68030           68040
     1   (DTR)       2   (DCD)
     2   (DCD)       1   (DTR)
     3   (TXD-)      5   (RXD)
     4   (GND)       4   (GND)
     5   (RXD-)      3   (TXD)
     8   (RXD+)      4   (GND)
     4   (GND)       8   (CTS)

     NOTE: This cable is symmetric and either end may be plugged
     into either system; the 68030 and 68040 labels simply iden-
     tify the signal name conventions used for the particular
     column.  Also note: when interconnecting 68030 and 68040
     systems, the 68040 flow control device names should not be
     used since 68030 systems do not support flow control.  This
     cable will allow some RS-422 devices to be used with 68040
     systems; however, not all RS-422 devices will function
     correctly.

Is this the right pinout scheme?  My system is a NeXtstation Mono Turbo.

If anyone wants to put one of these together for me and make a few
dollars in the bargain, let me know.

Casey Palowitch
cjp@unix.cis.pitt.edu

From: cjp+@pitt.edu (Casimir J Palowitch)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.marketplace
Subject: WANTED: NeXT --> Studio3 Cable
Summary: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: world
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Keywords: 

-- 
** Casimir J. (Casey) Palowitch  --  In 1996, there will be two kinds  **
**   cjp@unix.cis.pitt.edu       --  of computer professionals: those  **
**  cjp@icarus.lis.pitt.edu      --       who know NeXT, and those     **
**     cjp+@pitt.edu             --              without Jobs.         **