🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug11.155443.29872@cs.rose-hulman.edu>  
bohlkejh@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Jon H. Bohlke) writes:
> 
> In article <1992Aug11.045426.11072@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>  
> rob@shw.optics.rochester.edu (Rob Smith) writes:
> > 
> > I assume that again the NeXT c compiler will be based around,  
(include)  
> a gnu  
> > compiler. 
> > 
> > Which version? gcc 2.?? maybe?
> > 
> > I have some suns I can steal clock cycles off of and would like to  
> install a  
> > version of gcc to compile some of my non-Interfaced numerical c++  
code.  
> I would  
> > like to minimize incompatibility between the two compilers. 
> > Any recommendations? 
> > 
> > Which (gnu)c++ Libraries will be most compatible with the new NeXT  
> compiler?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > rob
> 
> I think it was 1.7 or something, but it was not 2.x.....
> 
> I have gcc 2.2.2 running on my system
> 
> Jon

I heard a 1.37 on a previous post.  Now I hear a 1.7.
Does anyone care to bid a 1.93?

Also, what's the difference between 1.93 and 2.0, besides the
NeXT-supplied Objective-C stuff getting put in?

And, what's the difference between 2.0 and 2.X.X, besides some
Objective-C optimization stuff (that didn't work right under g++2.0--but
doesn't effect the NeXT version because it DOES work right)?

So, what's the REAL gnu version of the NeXT compiler?

Alright, you might find a couple of other differences between the
C compiler shipped in 3.0 and the latest GNU version, but I for
one have no idea of what they might be.  Anyone else care to
enlighten us?


--
NeXTmail preferred!
-- 
---
root	                               root@dtint.dtint.com
Digital Technology Int.                (801)226-2984	
500 W. 1200 South, Orem UT, 84057      FAX (801) 226-8438