🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Apr8.195244.22829@newshost.lanl.gov>
tms@twins.lanl.gov writes:

>In article <1992Apr8.181710.25962@cs.yale.edu>
>nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (Nathan F.  Janette) writes:

>I'd be careful Nathan.  You are getting close to "sef"
>status.  (Although, I will admit you do back up your
>arguments, unlike Sean.) :-)

Looks like general warfare is about to break out.  It could
be avoided by a little temperance all around.  Your remark
about Sean is unwarranted (factually incorrect, too) and a
classic example of the cheap shot.  The threat to Nathan is
Nathan, not any approximation to Sean or anyone else.  My
guess is that all but a tiny number of the readers here
would find mostly self-impeachment in the majority of
Nathan's remarks.  I accept what he says, that he *thinks*
he's provoking a general airing of issues, though it seems
to me it's possible to do that without extravagances of the
type he seems determined to indulge in.  Well, different
strokes for different folks.  The discussion isn't going
anywhere, probably can't go anywhere.  Maybe the best thing
to do is dismiss it and get on to more useful things.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888