Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1186Re: Appsoft Draw or Stone's Creat'se: Which is better?
From: Jiro Nakamura
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 12:48
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 12:48
26 lines
1575 bytes
1575 bytes
In article <1992Apr1.164218.28923@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> morgan@fsu1.cc.fsu.edu (Justin Morgan) writes: > Has anyone done a head-to-head comparison between Draw (nee TopDraw) and > Create? Comments and criticisms are welcome. Which is the better value? NeXTwatch will be doing a comparison review of Appsoft Draw, Adobe Illustrator, and Stone Design Create in the May (#5) issue. But if you need to know before then, I'd recommend you download the demo version of Create and play with it, then bug Appsoft to release a demo of Draw. If you are a student/professor, then Create has a wonderful student price, which might be a consideration. - Jiro Nakamura Technical Editor / NeXTwatch ps. Never, ever, ever set the Reply-to to "sender". You will hopeless mess up anyone's chance of successfully replying to your message. If your news system inserted this for you, rib on your system administrator. If you did it, please read the Newsgrazer/rn/Cnews info panels on the meaning of the different headers. -- Jiro Nakamura jiro@shaman.com (NeXTmail) NeXTwatch / Technical Editor 76711,542 (CIS) The Shaman Group +1 607 277-1440 (Voice/Fax)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr8.124816.12429@shaman.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!shaman!jiroReferences:
<1992Apr1.164218.28923@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!shaman!jiro From: jiro@shaman.com (Jiro Nakamura) Subject: Re: Appsoft Draw or Stone's Creat'se: Which is better? Message-ID: <1992Apr8.124816.12429@shaman.com> Sender: jiro@shaman.com (Jiro Nakamura) Organization: Shaman Consulting References: <1992Apr1.164218.28923@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 12:48:16 GMT