Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1217Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
From: Todd M. Swan
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:31
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:31
18 lines
1347 bytes
1347 bytes
In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes: > QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's > slab standing in its upright position? Well, back in my PC days (Yes, it was a sad time indeed :-) I wondered the same thing about my AT. I was told that as long as the hard drive was formatted while it was vertical, everything would be fine. Had something to do with gravity's effect on the drive heads. I don't know if this is still true... Todd PS Does the extra 2.5 inches make that much difference? What about a higher chair or lower desk? -- ! "Finally, some good ! Todd M. Swan (ADP-2 - MS P910)! ! software for a PC." ! tms@lanl.gov (NeXTMail) ! ! -- Steve Jobs on ! Los Alamos National Laboratory! ! NeXTstep '486 ! Los Alamos, NM 87545 !
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr10.153133.24410@newshost.lanl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!newsReferences:
<9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!news From: tms@twins.lanl.gov (Todd M. Swan) Subject: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged? Message-ID: <1992Apr10.153133.24410@newshost.lanl.gov> Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov Reply-To: tms@twins.lanl.gov Organization: Los Alamos National Lab References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:31:33 GMT Lines: 18