Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1223Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
From: Ric Mommer
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:13
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:13
35 lines
2284 bytes
2284 bytes
In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes: > ... > Then my friend Paul wandered by and he said, "Gee, I'm not sure I'd leave > that thing standing up that way..." He didn't explain why. > > QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's > slab standing in its upright position? > > Dick Silbar Well, keep in mind the design of the NeXTstation for cooling. The bottom mounted fan is designed to force air over the motherboard. Make sure not to restrict the airflow into the machine. Another consideration is the hard drive. Although it runs fine in the vertical orientation, you should strongly consider reformatting the drive and reinstalling the OS with it vertical. The drive does operate differently sideways (albeit a minute difference) and in my experience with other PCs (Mac and DOS) the hard drive is prone to failure. I distinctly remember a host of technical reasons why, at its introduction, it was not recommended to orient the station on its side. If anyone has more specifics, please post 'em. An easier solution, and the one I would choose, is to simple order the longer monitor cable that ships with the cube ($60 I think) and put the station on a shelf somewhere with good ventilation. Ric Mommer Multimedia Computing Studio University of Iowa DISCLAIMER: These opinions are mine and not those of the University because the University can't afford any opinions at this time. I do believe the Union is negotiating for an increase in opinions. If an agreement is reached regarding the increase in opinioins, I would have to recommend to furlough the opinions until such time the University is more sound. Remember, the University that opinions the least, educates the most.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<12106@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!ns-mx!shumun.weeg.uiowa.eduReferences:
<9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!ns-mx!shumun.weeg.uiowa.edu From: rmommer@shumun.weeg.uiowa.edu (Ric Mommer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged? Message-ID: <12106@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> Date: 10 Apr 92 16:13:07 GMT References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> Sender: news@ns-mx.uiowa.edu Distribution: usa Lines: 35