Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1227Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
From: CHRIS ZOELLER * ZOELLER
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:36
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:36
53 lines
3498 bytes
3498 bytes
In article <1992Apr10.153133.24410@newshost.lanl.gov>, tms@twins.lanl.gov writes... >In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov >(Dick Silbar) writes: >> QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's >> slab standing in its upright position? > >Well, back in my PC days (Yes, it was a sad time indeed :-) I wondered the same >thing about my AT. I was told that as long as the hard drive was formatted >while it was vertical, everything would be fine. Had something to do with >gravity's effect on the drive heads. I don't know if this is still true... > >Todd >PS Does the extra 2.5 inches make that much difference? What about a higher >chair or lower desk? >-- From: DAC::ZOELLER "CHRIS ZOELLER * ZOELLER@LAMPF.LANL.GOV" 10-APR-1992 10:20:13.19 To: SMTP%"tms@twins.lanl.gov" CC: ZOELLER Subj: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged? >PS Does the extra 2.5 inches make that much difference? What about a higher >chair or lower desk? It's not the magnitude of the gravitational force vector, but the direction it points in that makes the difference. The HD heads are moved in and out radially on a straight line, When you mount the HD vertically, the gravitational force acts in a direction that may bend this straight line movement - the further "out" (towards the center of the disk) the heads are, the more torque is acting on the head guiding mechanism. Seagate specifically says in its HD installation manual not to mount HDs with their front or rear panel pointing up. A side panel pointing up is ok (Why this difference - I don't know, maybe because of some head mechanism details), but as you already said, they ought to be formatted in the position they will be used in. Another problem I can see: There are air guiding/cooling fins under- neath the power supply (at least in the "old" station I have) that channel air towards the fan and also seem to cool the power supply. With the slab not sitting on a flat surface, air flow along those fins will be impaired - may potentially overheat the power supply. Chris -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christoph M "Chris" Zoeller VMS Mail (preferred) Los Alamos National Laboratory Bitnet ZOELLER@LAMPF P-17 (Neutron and Nuclear Science) Internet zoeller@lampf.lanl.gov MS-H803 128.165.53.250 Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA 128.165.53.251 (505) 665-4126 (work) 128.165.53.252 (505) 665-4121 (fax) UNIX Mail zoeller@p17rw1.lanl.gov (505) 662-9497 (home) NeXT Mail Real Soon Now... --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10APR199210360945@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov!zoellerReferences:
<9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> <1992Apr10.153133.24410@newshost.lanl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov!zoeller From: zoeller@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (CHRIS ZOELLER * ZOELLER@LAMPF.LANL.GOV) Subject: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged? Message-ID: <10APR199210360945@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41 Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov Organization: LAMPF Data Analysis Center, Los Alamos, New Mexico References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> <1992Apr10.153133.24410@newshost.lanl.gov> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:36:00 GMT Lines: 55