🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1238

Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?

#1238
From: Ronald Pomeroy
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:21
21 lines
1507 bytes
In article <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov> silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar) writes:
[munch munch]
>OK, we decided, easy to fix by moving the slab out from under the 
>monitor.  But, the connector between the two is so short that we ended
>up putting the slab on its right-hand side, standing up, with the
>slot for the disk drive at the top.  Standing right behind the monitor
[munch munch]
>QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's
>slab standing in its upright position? 
>
>   Dick Silbar
The only real concern is head alignment on the internal drive - but
I've been running my slab vertial for 5 months now with no problems.
Do make sure that the cooling fins on the bottom are against a 
flat surface.  The air drawn by the fan should flow along the full
length of the heat sink (fins).

Ronald (vertical slabbin' dude) Pomeroy
Senior - Electrical Engineering
Texas A&M University (I are an AGGIE)
n189ds@tamuts.tamu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <12162@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!news.UU.NET!seismo!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun!tamuts!n189ds
References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!news.UU.NET!seismo!darwin.sura.net!mips!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun!tamuts!n189ds
From: n189ds@tamuts.tamu.edu (Ronald Pomeroy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Subject: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Keywords: vertical, slab
Message-ID: <12162@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:21:14 GMT
References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>
Sender: usenet@tamsun.tamu.edu
Followup-To: comp.sys.next.misc
Distribution: usa
Organization: ~/lib/organization
Lines: 21