Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #1250

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#1250

From: Charles Herrick
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 19:09

30 lines
1383 bytes

Dick Silbar writes
> Yesterday our group secretary received her new NeXTStation Turbo

dang, and us CC's are still running '030's!! WHIIIIINNNNNE!!

> (monochrome)

oh, well .. ok then :-)

[...]
> Rachel is one of those vertically challenged people (she's even shorter
> than I am) and after an hour or so of playing with the machine, her neck
> started getting tired with all that looking upward.  We had mounted
> the monitor on top of the horizontal slab.

Gee, I heard the TURBO's all come with a guarantee of weekly back-rubs  
from Jeff Martin in Developer Support! Have you filed with bug_next to get  
Rachel signed up?

> putting the slab on its right-hand side, standing up,
[...]
> QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's
> slab standing in its upright position? 

I've read in several places that hard drives need to remain in the same  
orientation in which they were formatted.

NeXT?

	chuck

Technical Details

Message-ID: <12171@tamsun.tamu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!news.UU.NET!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun!maraba.tamu.edu

References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!news.UU.NET!ogicse!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun!maraba.tamu.edu
From: cnh5730@maraba.tamu.edu (Charles Herrick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Subject: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Message-ID: <12171@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Date: 10 Apr 92 19:09:17 GMT
Article-I.D.: tamsun.12171
References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>
Sender: usenet@tamsun.tamu.edu
Lines: 30

Reply to Parent Message