Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #1267

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#1267

From: Bradley Head
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 20:04

25 lines
1511 bytes

Dick Silbar writes
> Yesterday our group secretary received her new NeXTStation Turbo
> (monochrome), and I am the designated setter-upper.  We got the Turbo
> running fine as a standalone machine (after moving out the old PC-AT 
> and a few shelves and re-arranging some cords and cables).  However, 
> Rachel is one of those vertically challenged people (she's even shorter
> than I am) and after an hour or so of playing with the machine, her neck
> started getting tired with all that looking upward.  We had mounted
> the monitor on top of the horizontal slab.
> 
Perhaps a better solution would be to:

1. Get a longer monitor cable - ask NeXT.
2. Rachel's table/desk is too high.
3. Rachel is sitting too low - forearms should be parallel with floor


...Brad



-- 
Bradley Head, bhead@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (NeXTmail :-)
InStep Mobile Communications, Inc., Headfirst Software Ltd. 
Executive of Vancouver NeXT User's Society, Vancouver, BC.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr10.200459.963@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!news.UU.NET!van-bc!questor!hfs!bhead

References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!news.UU.NET!van-bc!questor!hfs!bhead
From: bhead@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (Bradley Head)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Subject: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
Message-ID: <1992Apr10.200459.963@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 20:04:59 GMT
References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>
Sender: bhead@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (Bradley Head)
Reply-To: bhead@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (Bradley Head)
Organization: Headfirst Software, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Lines: 25

Reply to Parent Message