Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #1279

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#1279

From: David V. Wallace
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:39

10 lines
856 bytes

   Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:53:00 GMT
   From: silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov (Dick Silbar)

   QUESTION: is there any good reason why we _shouldn't_ leave Rachel's
   slab standing in its upright position? 

How about:
 o - Dust in the floppy drive?
 o - It might tip over?
 o - You'll deprive NeXT of the revenue from selling you a longer cable?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <GUMBY.92Apr10063943@Cygnus.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!data!gumby

References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!data!gumby
From: gumby@Cygnus.COM (David V. Wallace)
Subject: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
In-Reply-To: silbar@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov's message of Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:53:00 GMT
References: <9APR199221530916@mpx2.lampf.lanl.gov>
Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov
Organization: Cygnus Support, Palo Alto, California
Date: 10 Apr 92 06:39:43
Message-ID: <GUMBY.92Apr10063943@Cygnus.COM>
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message