Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1479Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged?
From: Andrew Loewenstern
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 07:18
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 07:18
19 lines
1243 bytes
1243 bytes
In article <1992Apr10.235556.16143@bmw.mayo.edu> brunkhorst@mayo.edu (Geoff Brunkhorst) writes: > In any event, a NeXT employee recommended the positioning in such a manner > (maybe to make the sale, but I doubt he would have voided a warranty for > that. I have seen no problems, and doubt that I will in the long term. Putting a slab anything but perfectly horizontal voids your warranty. NeXT is going to start shipping them with levels and plumbobs to ensure that the NeXT logo on the front of the slab is angled precisely 28 degrees from the horizon... andrew ;-) ;-) ;-) -- andrew@cubetech.com Andrew Loewenstern | "listen: there's a hell of a good universe Cube Technologies, Inc. | next door; let's go." --- e.e. cummings
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr12.071824.998@cubetech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!psinntp!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrewReferences:
<1992Apr10.235556.16143@bmw.mayo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!psinntp!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrew From: andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern) Subject: Re: Is the NeXTStation Turbo vertically disadvantaged? Message-ID: <1992Apr12.071824.998@cubetech.com> Sender: andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern) Reply-To: andrew@cubetech.com References: <1992Apr10.235556.16143@bmw.mayo.edu> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 07:18:24 GMT Lines: 19