Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1520Did comp.sys.next.richposts pass?
From: Charles Herrick
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 17:12
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 17:12
17 lines
1055 bytes
1055 bytes
In article <1992Apr10.173911.4603@newshost.lanl.gov> tms@twins.lanl.gov (Todd M. Swan) writes: $ In article <1992Apr10.160856.2790@cs.yale.edu> nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu $ (Nathan F. Janette) writes: $ > If anyone bothers to announce the results of the vote, I'm $ > sure there will be a nice new comp.sys.next.rtf, where $ > such neat posts will most *definitely* belong. $ $ I bet there won't be. Even if there is it won't work. I hope there will be. A negative result of the voting on the recently-proposed comp.sys.next.richposts should be construed as an affirmative for continued (perhaps even expanded) rich-text postings on all other comp.sys.next.* groups.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<12388@tamsun.tamu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun!maraba.tamu.eduReferences:
<1992Apr10.173911.4603@newshost.lanl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun!maraba.tamu.edu From: cnh5730@maraba.tamu.edu (Charles Herrick) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Did comp.sys.next.richposts pass? Message-ID: <12388@tamsun.tamu.edu> Date: 14 Apr 92 17:12:53 GMT References: <1992Apr10.173911.4603@newshost.lanl.gov> Sender: usenet@tamsun.tamu.edu Lines: 17