Re: RTF, Mime, and me

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #1575

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#1575

From: Randy McCaskill
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 00:25

17 lines
988 bytes

I almost wish the rtf group had passed.  Not for posting of rtf files,
but so that I wouldn't have to deal with all the stupid arguments
about it.  I think the rtf arguments belong in some news.* group
and the other comments about Mime probably belong in comp.mail.*.  I
really don't care where they belong, I am just tired of the constant
arguments about them.

Love,
-Randy

------
 _ __
' )  )              /
 /--' __.  ____  __/ __  ,
/  \_(_/|_/ / <_(_/_/ (_/_
Randy McCaskill        /
rmccask@seas.gwu.edu  '

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr15.002518.18354@seas.gwu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!seas.gwu.edu!rmccask

References: <1992Apr10.074920.7384@darkcube.radig.de> <1992Apr13.070739.1716@gagetalker.com> <1992Apr14.233633.17462@macc.wisc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!seas.gwu.edu!rmccask
From: rmccask@seas.gwu.edu (Randy McCaskill)
Subject: Re: RTF, Mime, and me
Message-ID: <1992Apr15.002518.18354@seas.gwu.edu>
Sender: news@seas.gwu.edu
Organization: George Washington University
References: <1992Apr10.074920.7384@darkcube.radig.de> <1992Apr13.070739.1716@gagetalker.com> <1992Apr14.233633.17462@macc.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 00:25:18 GMT
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message