Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1638OpenGL vs. Renderman
From: Anthony Berno
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 21:14
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 21:14
19 lines
1276 bytes
1276 bytes
In light of the release of 3.0 with bundled Renderman being just a few months away, it is interesting to note that in a recent issue of Computer Graphics World that the closing column discusses Silicon Graphics' licensing of OpenGL, a derivative of the Iris GL, to other OS vendors. The column discusses a few other graphics systems, such as PHIGS et al. and comes to the definite conclusion that OpenGL will be THE standard for high end graphics starting NOW, and that it is the BEST of all of them. Has NeXT made a critical mistake in going with Renderman? Is the NeXT, in the wake of this possible sweep of graphics systems, going to be left in the dust with yet another fundamental incompatibility? I thought that Renderman would, in only a few years, propel NeXT into the front ranks of 3D graphics / CAD / animation. Now I'm not so sure. Comments? -Anthony
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr15.211445.16925@godel.questor.wimsey.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!questor!godel!abernoShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!questor!godel!aberno From: aberno@godel.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (Anthony Berno) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: OpenGL vs. Renderman Message-ID: <1992Apr15.211445.16925@godel.questor.wimsey.bc.ca> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 21:14:45 GMT Sender: aberno@godel.questor.wimsey.bc.ca Reply-To: aberno@godel.questor.wimsey.bc.ca Lines: 20