Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1655OSF/1 for NeXT
From: Marcos Polanco
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 04:19
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 04:19
7 lines
582 bytes
582 bytes
Is there any reason why NeXT should not replace BSD4.3 with OSF/1? OSF One is based on Mach, so the move would not be tremendously difficult. It would also make NeXT a bit more friendly with DEC, HP, IBM, etc., etc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr16.041911.17628@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news From: overlord@amy9.stanford.edu (Marcos Polanco) Subject: OSF/1 for NeXT Message-ID: <1992Apr16.041911.17628@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Organization: DSG, Stanford University Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 04:19:11 GMT Lines: 8