Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1673Re: NeXT TeX and Postscript (was Re: Neuron (really networking NeXT vs. Mac))
From: Andrew Loewenstern
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 11:55
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 11:55
45 lines
3176 bytes
3176 bytes
In article <1992Apr13.035754.11198@utstat.uucp> philip@utstat.uucp (Philip McDunnough) writes: > It's simply harder for most people. And it's "most people" who > will determine the future. Believe it or not, most people are not going to use TeX on any platform simply because it's a bitch to use (you and I think it's easy, but most people don't like to write typesetting code). "most poeple" are going to buy PasteUp or FrameMaker and not even think about TeX. I'd be willing to bet that less than 5% of NeXT users right now use TeX, and probably less will use it in the future as more NeXTstep computers hopefully end up on executive's desk. I think you are being limited in your evaluation of the NeXT computer's ease of use. Workstations are hard for people who are not unix weenies to use. PC's aren't. NeXT is going to have a much harder time competing with Macintoshes since Macs are already easy to use. Sun's are hard to use. Lots of people are giving up their tricked out 486s and are going to Sparcstations. NeXT gives you what's good about a Sparcstation (speed, real operating system) and what's good about a Macintosh (sexy and easy to use interface) rolled up into an as of yet unbeatable development environment. Apple is going to sell more LC-II computers in 3 or 4 months than there are NeXT computers in existance. This is one gem of high-technology. It's got a 32-bit 68030 processor on a 16-bit bus. It's no faster than the 020 based LC. I think someone at Apple figured out that they could just cram in an 030 more cheaply than slightly redesigning the board for a 6551 PMMU chip (the only reason for the 030 was to support sys-7 vm). NeXT just can't compete with this. If people are willing to buy a piece of crap like the LC-II, why on earth would they buy an 'expensive' computer like a NeXT? NeXT can compete with Sun though. Trying to compete with someone who will definitely crush you in the near term (Apple or Microsoft) will just waste your energy and money and not do any good. According to the NeXT propoganda, they are doing very well against Sun when a company considers both NeXT and Sun. This is good. It took NeXT a while to find a market in which they could succeed in, but now that they have found it, they are really concentrating their energies. Concentrating your energies on one thing is so much better than flip-flopping between target markets... andrew -- andrew@cubetech.com Andrew Loewenstern | "listen: there's a hell of a good universe Cube Technologies, Inc. | next door; let's go." --- e.e. cummings
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr14.115526.1988@cubetech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!infopiz!lupine!uupsi!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrewReferences:
<1992Apr13.035754.11198@utstat.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!infopiz!lupine!uupsi!psinntp!cubetech.com!imladris!andrew Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: NeXT TeX and Postscript (was Re: Neuron (really networking NeXT vs. Mac)) Message-ID: <1992Apr14.115526.1988@cubetech.com> From: andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern) Date: 14 Apr 92 11:55:26 GMT Reply-To: andrew@cubetech.com Sender: andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern) References: <1992Apr13.035754.11198@utstat.uucp> Lines: 45