🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Apr14.095315.13156@gagetalker.com>
scotty@gagetalker.com (Scott Turner) writes:

>Frankly I see this RTF group as a mistake. When SEF doesn't have any
>actual RTF postings to bounce he'll move on to bouncing the re-director
>postings telling people about postings in the RTF groups.

Not a safe bet, but such predictions aren't useful.

>csn needed spliting up for reasons other
>than to give RTF postings a SEF-free zone. 
[...]>
>Will
>SEF decide the best way to continue his campaign will be [...]
>this whole
>thing is bull shit.

Isn't it, though?

Sean Fagan seems to have captured your entire attention,
Scott, since three of your four paragraphs are reactions to
this one single phenomenon.  I don't think it's so much a
matter of bullshit as it is of giving greater priority to
useful work -- even useful disagreement.

The business of water is to flow; it goes around the rocks
in the streambed.  It does so easily, automatically, without
effort worth noting.  We should probably be doing likewise.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888