Re: SEF did it again

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #1688

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#1688

From: Nathan F. Janette
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:54

17 lines
1192 bytes

In article <1992Apr14.104753.13285@gagetalker.com> scotty@gagetalker.com (Scott  
Turner) writes:

> rtf group goes down then RTF postings keep right on going
> in csnm. If the rtf group goes through then the redirector
> messages will consume far more bandwidth than all the rtf
> postings to csnm ever did.

If you are referring one sentence "text pointers" in csnm articles
to the (aborted) rtf group as "redirector messages", it would take
quite a few zillion of them to support the above argument.

--
Nathan Janette		"I'm a NeXTstep man,
Dept MB&B, Yale Univ	 I'm a NeXTcube guy"
New Haven, CT
nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (NeXT)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr16.155458.27841@cs.yale.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!cs.yale.edu!news

References: <1992Apr14.104753.13285@gagetalker.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!cs.yale.edu!news
From: nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (Nathan F. Janette)
Subject: Re: SEF did it again
Message-ID: <1992Apr16.155458.27841@cs.yale.edu>
Sender: news@cs.yale.edu (Usenet News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: jacobi.biology.yale.edu
Reply-To: nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu
Organization: Yale University, Department of Computer Science, New Haven, CT
References: <1992Apr14.104753.13285@gagetalker.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:54:58 GMT
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message