Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1733NeXT vs PC
From: Edmund Ronald
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 22:19
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 22:19
16 lines
1302 bytes
1302 bytes
I don't want to flame, but I own a NeXT, a PC and a Mac II. I have taken the NeXT dev class, so I know how to use the thing. Still, I find that my old Toshiba T1000 with no hard disk and Turbo Pascal 5.5 outperfroms the NeXT for simple programming. The reason is speed. TP can take under a second to compile, and hilites the errors in the editor. The strong typing catches most bugs immediately. I've written both a neural net program, and a genetic algorithm that way, and found it to be the fastest way to get the job done. Also, I can carry the T1000 around, it runs off the RAM disk for 4 hours, and GETS THE JOB DONE. The NeXT environment is great, but awfully slow (several seconds) badly integrated (no editor-compiler combo that hilites errors fast), has no real compile-time checking (the trouble with C) . It is GREAT however for writing GUI applications. There it beats anything else hands down. Ha- I have fed the flames some more :-) Edmund.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199204162219.AA27929@cnam.cnam.fr>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!CNAM.CNAM.FR!eronaldShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!CNAM.CNAM.FR!eronald From: eronald@CNAM.CNAM.FR (Edmund Ronald) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: NeXT vs PC Message-ID: <199204162219.AA27929@cnam.cnam.fr> Date: 16 Apr 92 22:19:59 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Lines: 16