Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #1777Re: 88110 and 56001 -- How many MFLOPS ?
From: Jon H. Bohlke
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 04:15
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 04:15
20 lines
1333 bytes
1333 bytes
In article <1992Apr16.180949.26816@cs.ucla.edu> esky@marathon.cs.ucla.edu (Eskandar Ensafi) writes: > Hi, > > Does anyone know how many MFLOPS the Motorola 56001 DSP and 88110 CPU are > capabale of? I am trying to compare this to the 80 MFLOPS of the 33-MHx i860 > and to the 50 MFLOPS of the 33-MHz 96002 DSP. > > If two 88110s can't beat the 50 MFLOPS of the 96002, then don't you think NeXT > should use the 96002 in its future and/or current systems? I am not suggesting > the i860 because the 96002 provides binary compatibility with the 56001. MFLOPS is a crappy benchmark, because it (like MIPS) does not include the instruction count. Jon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr17.041538.29185@cs.rose-hulman.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!newshost.cs.rose-hulman.edu!newsReferences:
<1992Apr16.180949.26816@cs.ucla.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!newshost.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news From: mgrjhb@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Jon H. Bohlke) Subject: Re: 88110 and 56001 -- How many MFLOPS ? Message-ID: <1992Apr17.041538.29185@cs.rose-hulman.edu> Keywords: flops Sender: news@cs.rose-hulman.edu (The News Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: manager.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu Reply-To: mgrjhb@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Jon H. Bohlke) Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology References: <1992Apr16.180949.26816@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 04:15:38 GMT Lines: 21