🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Sep5.232230.25340@cube.handheld.com> jmd@cube.handheld.com  
(Jim De Arras) writes:
> In article <1992Sep5.163800.18684@tamsun.tamu.edu> lusty@lusty.tamu.edu  
(Lusty  
> Wench) writes:
> > In article <1992Aug30.153807.17981@cube.handheld.com>  
jmd@cube.handheld.com  
> (Jim De Arras) writes:
> > >
> > >He can't do anything about it, Philips TV's look just as bad.  It's  
an issue  
> of  
> > >phosphers.  Sony has the best, the best red in specific.
> > >
> > >Jim
> > 
> > Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.  Here you have a guy in
> > management who is not only open to suggestions but who is even
> > *anxious* to hear specific ways in which they can improve their 
> > product, and all you can do is say "forget it, you don't stand a 
> > chance".  I guess it's more fun to complain about why something 
> > is a piece of junk than it is to offer constructive suggestions 
> > on how it can be made better.
> > 
> > 
> > Lusty Wench
> 
> Perhaps I was too abrupt in my reply.  The difference between Sony and  
Philips'  
> colo[u]r CRTs is historic, and a matter of pride to BOTH companies.    
Philips  
> thinks their phospers look better than Sony's. 

I see! Philips employees are color blind....

--
Ton Koelman   e-mail: koelman@stc.nato.int (NeXT Mail Welcome!)
SHAPE Technical Centre, P.O. Box 174, 2501 CD  The Hague
The Netherlands  (voice: 31-70-3142429, fax: 31-70-3142111)