Re: Spreadsheets (was Mesa vs. Appsoft)

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #1937

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#1937

From: Clifford T. Matthews
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 05:42

10 lines
790 bytes

David Gursky posted:
>>I'll throw my two cents in to this debate.  The one thing missing from
>>everyone's spreadsheet application is compatibility with Excel...

Excel 3.0a for the Macintosh runs under Executor 1.2 (shipping today).
Excel 4.0 for the Macintosh runs under Executor 1.2.1 (shipping sometime
next week, assuming we get the manuals back from the printer).

	--Cliff[ord T. Matthews]
	ctm@ardi.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep9.054241.26611@unmvax.cs.unm.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!nic.csu.net!koko.csustan.edu!rat!unmvax!ctm

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!nic.csu.net!koko.csustan.edu!rat!unmvax!ctm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Subject: Re: Spreadsheets (was Mesa vs. Appsoft)
Message-ID: <1992Sep9.054241.26611@unmvax.cs.unm.edu>
From: ctm@ardi.com (Clifford T. Matthews)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 05:42:41 GMT
Sender: ctm@unmvax.cs.unm.edu (Clifford T. Matthews)
Organization: ARDI
Lines: 10