🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #2039

Re: 3.0's C compiler ?

#2039
From: Jim De Arras
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 14:29
65 lines
2512 bytes
In article <1992Aug12.042213.29139@dtint.uucp> nevin@dtint.dtint.com writes:
> In article <1992Aug11.155443.29872@cs.rose-hulman.edu>  
> bohlkejh@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Jon H. Bohlke) writes:
> > 
> > In article <1992Aug11.045426.11072@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>  
> > rob@shw.optics.rochester.edu (Rob Smith) writes:
> > > 
> > > I assume that again the NeXT c compiler will be based around,  
> (include)  
> > a gnu  
> > > compiler. 
> > > 
> > > Which version? gcc 2.?? maybe?
> > > 
> > > I have some suns I can steal clock cycles off of and would like to  
> > install a  
> > > version of gcc to compile some of my non-Interfaced numerical c++  
> code.  
> > I would  
> > > like to minimize incompatibility between the two compilers. 
> > > Any recommendations? 
> > > 
> > > Which (gnu)c++ Libraries will be most compatible with the new NeXT  
> > compiler?
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > rob
> > 
> > I think it was 1.7 or something, but it was not 2.x.....
> > 
> > I have gcc 2.2.2 running on my system
> > 
> > Jon
> 
> I heard a 1.37 on a previous post.  Now I hear a 1.7.
> Does anyone care to bid a 1.93?
> 
> Also, what's the difference between 1.93 and 2.0, besides the
> NeXT-supplied Objective-C stuff getting put in?
> 
> And, what's the difference between 2.0 and 2.X.X, besides some
> Objective-C optimization stuff (that didn't work right under g++2.0--but
> doesn't effect the NeXT version because it DOES work right)?
> 
> So, what's the REAL gnu version of the NeXT compiler?
> 
> Alright, you might find a couple of other differences between the
> C compiler shipped in 3.0 and the latest GNU version, but I for
> one have no idea of what they might be.  Anyone else care to
> enlighten us?
> 
> 
> --
> NeXTmail preferred!
> -- 
> ---
> root	                               root@dtint.dtint.com
> Digital Technology Int.                (801)226-2984	
> 500 W. 1200 South, Orem UT, 84057      FAX (801) 226-8438

Per GNU, (check the newsgroups!) all 2.x releases are beta, and not ready for  
prime time!

Jim
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug13.142923.4575@cube.handheld.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!uvaarpa!clem!news
References: <1992Aug12.042213.29139@dtint.uucp>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!uvaarpa!clem!news
From: jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim De Arras)
Subject: Re: 3.0's C compiler ?
Message-ID: <1992Aug13.142923.4575@cube.handheld.com>
Sender: news@cube.handheld.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: dale
Organization: Hand Held Products, Inc.
References: <1992Aug12.042213.29139@dtint.uucp>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 14:29:23 GMT
Lines: 65