Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #2039Re: 3.0's C compiler ?
From: Jim De Arras
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 14:29
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 14:29
65 lines
2512 bytes
2512 bytes
In article <1992Aug12.042213.29139@dtint.uucp> nevin@dtint.dtint.com writes: > In article <1992Aug11.155443.29872@cs.rose-hulman.edu> > bohlkejh@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Jon H. Bohlke) writes: > > > > In article <1992Aug11.045426.11072@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> > > rob@shw.optics.rochester.edu (Rob Smith) writes: > > > > > > I assume that again the NeXT c compiler will be based around, > (include) > > a gnu > > > compiler. > > > > > > Which version? gcc 2.?? maybe? > > > > > > I have some suns I can steal clock cycles off of and would like to > > install a > > > version of gcc to compile some of my non-Interfaced numerical c++ > code. > > I would > > > like to minimize incompatibility between the two compilers. > > > Any recommendations? > > > > > > Which (gnu)c++ Libraries will be most compatible with the new NeXT > > compiler? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > rob > > > > I think it was 1.7 or something, but it was not 2.x..... > > > > I have gcc 2.2.2 running on my system > > > > Jon > > I heard a 1.37 on a previous post. Now I hear a 1.7. > Does anyone care to bid a 1.93? > > Also, what's the difference between 1.93 and 2.0, besides the > NeXT-supplied Objective-C stuff getting put in? > > And, what's the difference between 2.0 and 2.X.X, besides some > Objective-C optimization stuff (that didn't work right under g++2.0--but > doesn't effect the NeXT version because it DOES work right)? > > So, what's the REAL gnu version of the NeXT compiler? > > Alright, you might find a couple of other differences between the > C compiler shipped in 3.0 and the latest GNU version, but I for > one have no idea of what they might be. Anyone else care to > enlighten us? > > > -- > NeXTmail preferred! > -- > --- > root root@dtint.dtint.com > Digital Technology Int. (801)226-2984 > 500 W. 1200 South, Orem UT, 84057 FAX (801) 226-8438 Per GNU, (check the newsgroups!) all 2.x releases are beta, and not ready for prime time! Jim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug13.142923.4575@cube.handheld.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!uvaarpa!clem!newsReferences:
<1992Aug12.042213.29139@dtint.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!uvaarpa!clem!news From: jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim De Arras) Subject: Re: 3.0's C compiler ? Message-ID: <1992Aug13.142923.4575@cube.handheld.com> Sender: news@cube.handheld.com Nntp-Posting-Host: dale Organization: Hand Held Products, Inc. References: <1992Aug12.042213.29139@dtint.uucp> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 14:29:23 GMT Lines: 65