Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #2164Spreadsheets (was Mesa vs. Appsoft)
From: David Gursky
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 05:12
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 05:12
43 lines
2686 bytes
2686 bytes
CT is Clifford T. Matthews, ctm@ardi.com David Pollack is dpp@athena.com and my Internet address is too complicated for me to generate manually... CT> I don't think I missed David Gursky's point, but perhaps in my desire CT> to make my last post brief (anyone who reads my posts knows what an CT> exception that was), I didn't make *my* point clear... <Stuff Deleted> Fair enough and enough said. CT> <Stuff Deleted> Cliff and ARDI's job is to blur the boundaries, so *you* CT> can make *your* choice. Read on... CT> If you've watched what we've done with Executor so far, you know what CT> you can expect in the future. Even though I'm a person of principle, CT> I'm always afraid that by acting according to principle, I'll dismiss CT> something good without trying it. If you're opposed to Executor "on CT> principle", I hope you'll check it out. It could be the tool that you CT> need. Although I've been working with the NeXT (as well as several other workstations, notably Sun / Solaris, Apple / Macintosh, and IBM PS/2 / OS/2) over the past several years, I have only recently begun to work with the NeXT on a more detailed basis, so I have not been privvy to the history of Executor. At a basic level however, IMO, I agree with David Pollock's comment (not quoted) that if I wanted to run Mac applications on a day-in and day-out basis, I would have bought a Mac - a consumer will buy a product that they are comfortable using. However fine a product Executor is, it has an intrinisic flaw - it makes the NeXT look like a Mac, and as a consumer, that's not why I bought the NeXT (see David Pollack's earlier message.) That being said, I'm not (in principle) opposed to products like Executor that allow me run Mac applications, it is that I'm opposed to taking the NeXT and turn it into a Mac. Ideally, I'd like a product like Executor to give the Mac application a NeXT look-and-feel, so that not only do I need concern myself with a single "look-and-feel", but for all intents and purposes, it appears to me that Excel (as a specific example) is running on my NeXT, just as Appsoft Draw or Lighthouse's Concurrence products do (as two other specific examples) [Are you listening Insignia? This applies to SoftPC as much as Cliff's product.] Comments? Flames? Recommendations for good restaurants?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<716454024.F00001@blkcat.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!blkcat!UucpShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: David.Gursky@p394.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org (David Gursky) Sender: Uucp@blkcat.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!blkcat!Uucp Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Spreadsheets (was Mesa vs. Appsoft) Message-ID: <716454024.F00001@blkcat.UUCP> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 00:12:39 -0500 Lines: 43