Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #2282Re: Which DAT Format to Adopt
From: Paul S. Sears
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 14:36
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 14:36
42 lines
2495 bytes
2495 bytes
In article <1992Aug26.220255.4795@fnbc.com> billb@fnbc.com (Bill Burcham)
writes:
=>I think that I want to buy either an HP 35480A 5(8)Gb, or an Archive
=>4352XP 2(8)Gb DAT drive for backup purposes.
=>
=>1) What is your experience with the reliability, support of these two
=>drives.
=>
We use an Archive Python for our NeXT cluster (and to remotely backup Suns,
HPs, DECs, SGIs, etc) and it has been a dream to use. My only gripe is about
the lack of good, quality backup software. Dump and gnutar just don't always
cut it...
I have worked with HPs drive (not sure of the model) and it seemed to also be
a good product. Pretty reliable. Not sure how easy it is to use, because we
were using HPs built in software via Sam to backup...
=>2) Do these use different formats. If so, then which format would be more
=>amenable to sharing data with other NeXTs, Suns, or Macs (i.e. which
=>format is prevalent in the NeXT/Sun/Mac world).
What you need to watch out for is the format of the tape when it is
compressed, that is if you elect to use compression. There are 2 or 3
different compression formats and each vendor supports their own. A tape that
was dumped on an HP drive with compression generally cannot be used on an
Archive drive. However, if the data is not compressed, then tapes can be
moved across drives...
=>
=>Any other comments are welcomed -- I'll summarize.
=>--
=>| Bill Burcham | "The real world is the place |
=>| billb@fnbc.com (NeXTmail) | |
--
Paul S. Sears * sears@uh.edu (NeXT Mail OK)
The University of Houston * suggestions@tree.egr.uh.edu (NeXT
Engineering Computing Center * comments, complaints, questions)
NeXT System Administration * DoD#1967 '83 NightHawk 650SC
>>> SSI Diving Certification #755020059 <<<
"Programming is like sex: One mistake and you support it a lifetime."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug28.143605.20308@menudo.uh.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!usenetReferences:
<1992Aug26.220255.4795@fnbc.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!usenet From: sears@tree.egr.uh.edu (Paul S. Sears) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: Which DAT Format to Adopt Message-ID: <1992Aug28.143605.20308@menudo.uh.edu> Date: 28 Aug 92 14:36:05 GMT References: <1992Aug26.220255.4795@fnbc.com> Sender: usenet@menudo.uh.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: sears@tree.egr.uh.edu Organization: University of Houston Lines: 42 Nntp-Posting-Host: sierra.egr.uh.edu