Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #255Re: Icon, or equivalent under 3.0
From: Sam Streeper
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 18:30
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 18:30
32 lines
1949 bytes
1949 bytes
I usually ignore stupid posts, but this one was more annoying than most. fermat@fermat.dartmouth.edu writes: > Sounds great. How about a version that only does icons, crashes often, > has maybe half the functionality of the old Icon.app, and costs me $0. > Appsoft has GOT to be kidding me if they think this grad student is gonna > fork over $300 for an app that comes free with every other computer > imaginable. Icon was unmaintainable crap. There was no way it was going to evolve into a stable app. It was an embarassment, albeit a necessary one at the time, and it probably discouraged the development of decent tools. I doubt that you can find an free app on "any other computer imaginable" with the functionality of Image, or the bugginess of Icon. Appsoft is not the bad guy here. They're committed to supplying great software on the NeXT, and should be applauded. Furthermore, if you're not willing to pay a price that justifies the development of a product, I doubt you're the target market for ANYTHING. > Anyone up for a boycot of this app till the price drops below $30 > educational for something that does something similar? The product you suggest would involve about a man-year of work and would wholesale for about fifteen bucks. If you truly have faith in this lucrative marketplace, why don't you jump in and reap the profits? If it's really excellent, I'll buy it so that's $15 pre-sold. -sam opinions are my own, and I haven't been been a part of any decision-process that anyone would get very worked up about.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5739@rosie.NeXT.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rosie!NeXT.comReferences:
<1992Oct28.075751.28801@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rosie!NeXT.com From: sam_s@NeXT.com (Sam Streeper) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: Icon, or equivalent under 3.0 Message-ID: <5739@rosie.NeXT.COM> Date: 4 Nov 92 18:30:58 GMT References: <1992Oct28.075751.28801@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Sender: news@NeXT.COM Reply-To: sam_s@NeXT.com Lines: 33