Re: NeXTstep 3.0

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #2613

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#2613

From: Christopher Songer
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 20:43

16 lines
1184 bytes

nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu writes:
>
>Given the choice, I would have had NeXT make separate
>(later) releases of the new packages (dbkit, 3D stuff,
>etc) and just work on getting the stable base release out
>on time. 
>

I'd have to agree with this. My current assumption is that 3.0 is likely
to be pretty unstable -- I think I'm going to wait for 3.1. If this does
in fact come to pass (I'd like to be wrong) then Next seems to be making 
a habit of this. (I'm sure everyone recalls how stable 2.0 was :) Next
has great software, but the base has to be stable for it to be usable.

Anyway,
-Chris

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug18.204351.178605@lexmark.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!ukma!lexmark!songer

References: <57135@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1992Aug18.165446.25866@cs.yale.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!ukma!lexmark!songer
From: songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer)
Subject: Re: NeXTstep 3.0
Message-ID: <1992Aug18.204351.178605@lexmark.com>
X-Disclaimer: These views are the poster's and not necessarily those of Lexmark
Sender: usenet@lexmark.com (News Dude)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 9.51.7.57
Organization: Lexington, KY
References: <57135@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1992Aug18.165446.25866@cs.yale.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 20:43:51 GMT
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message