Re: NeXTstep 3.0

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #2616

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#2616

From: Hal.Varian
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 21:29

27 lines
1315 bytes

In article <1992Aug18.204351.178605@lexmark.com>  
songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer) writes:

> I'd have to agree with this. My current assumption is that 3.0  
is likely
> to be pretty unstable -- I think I'm going to wait for 3.1. If  
this does
> in fact come to pass (I'd like to be wrong) then Next seems to  
be making 
> a habit of this. (I'm sure everyone recalls how stable 2.0 was  
:) Next
> has great software, but the base has to be stable for it to be  
usable.
> 
> Anyway,
> -Chris

I've been beta testing 3.0 PR2, and I think that it is *very*  
stable.  The major gaps are in the documentation.  My guess is  
that 3.0 will be better than most other x.0 releases in the  
computer industry.

--
Hal.Varian@umich.edu    Hal Varian
voice: 313-764-2364     Dept of Economics
fax:   313-764-2364     Univ of Michigan
                        Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug18.212907.21004@lsa.umich.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!destroyer!lsa.umich.edu!news

References: <1992Aug18.204351.178605@lexmark.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!destroyer!lsa.umich.edu!news
From: Hal.Varian@umich.edu
Subject: Re: NeXTstep 3.0
Message-ID: <1992Aug18.212907.21004@lsa.umich.edu>
Sender: news@lsa.umich.edu
Reply-To: Hal.Varian@umich.edu
Organization: University of Michigan Math Dept
References: <1992Aug18.204351.178605@lexmark.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 21:29:07 GMT
Lines: 27

Reply to Parent Message