🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Aug18.204351.178605@lexmark.com> songer@lexmark.com  
(Christopher Songer) writes:
> nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu writes:
> >
> >Given the choice, I would have had NeXT make separate
> >(later) releases of the new packages (dbkit, 3D stuff,
> >etc) and just work on getting the stable base release out
> >on time. 
> >
> 
> I'd have to agree with this. My current assumption is that 3.0 is likely
> to be pretty unstable -- I think I'm going to wait for 3.1. If this does
> in fact come to pass (I'd like to be wrong) then Next seems to be making 
> a habit of this. (I'm sure everyone recalls how stable 2.0 was :) Next
> has great software, but the base has to be stable for it to be usable.
> 
> Anyway,
> -Chris

I am running the 3.0 Beta.  It is very stable, and I would never go back  
to my 2.1 system, even if the 3.0 Beta was the FINAL release.

--
NeXTmail preferred!
-- 
---
root	                               root@dtint.dtint.com
Digital Technology Int.                (801)226-2984	
500 W. 1200 South, Orem UT, 84057      FAX (801) 226-8438