NS 3.0 Robustness (was Re: NeXTstep 3.0)

Article View: comp.sys.next.misc

Article #2661

Back to comp.sys.next.misc Previous Next

#2661

From: Stuart Ritchie
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 21:56

9 lines
772 bytes

It's good to hear the beta testers praising 3.0 for
its robustness.  From my personal experience, NS 3.0
has a 75% failure rate.  3 out of the 4 demonstrations
that I have seen, performed by NeXT employees, have
resulted in system crashes.

"Uh, I think it's wedged, Bruce."

Stuart

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug19.215611.29113@cs.ubc.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!ubc-cs!sritchie

References: <1992Aug18.212907.21004@lsa.umich.edu> <1992Aug19.021716.301@metrosoft.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!ubc-cs!sritchie
From: sritchie@cs.ubc.ca (Stuart Ritchie)
Subject: NS 3.0 Robustness (was Re: NeXTstep 3.0)
Message-ID: <1992Aug19.215611.29113@cs.ubc.ca>
Sender: usenet@cs.ubc.ca (Usenet News)
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
References: <1992Aug18.212907.21004@lsa.umich.edu> <1992Aug19.021716.301@metrosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 92 21:56:11 GMT
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message