Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #273Re: IconBuilder: A [harsh] commentary - was Re: Icon, or equivalent under 3.0
From: David J. Anderson
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 15:40
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 15:40
14 lines
1278 bytes
1278 bytes
I've used Icon under 2.1 and IconBuilder under 3.0. All I can say is that I can make decent icons using both. They have their differences. I like some things in IconBuilder better than those in Icon, and vice-versa. I spend less than 15 minutes a week building icons. If I had to do more of it, I'd either buy a good tool, write a better tool myself. For the occasional user, Icon and Icon Builder are virtually equivalent. ____________________________________________________________________ Dave Anderson | ...consequently, society expects all earnestly the dman | responsible communication to be crisply brief... dave@afs.com | we are not seeking a license to ramble wordily.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov4.154009.1306@afs.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sunic!psinntp!psinntp!afs!daveReferences:
<2AEC306E.74E3@deneva.sdd.trw.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sunic!psinntp!psinntp!afs!dave From: dave@godel (David J. Anderson) Subject: Re: IconBuilder: A [harsh] commentary - was Re: Icon, or equivalent under 3.0 Message-ID: <1992Nov4.154009.1306@afs.com> Sender: dave@afs.com References: <2AEC306E.74E3@deneva.sdd.trw.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 15:40:09 GMT Lines: 14