Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #2812Re: _nextstep_ television show!
From: Matthew M. Stecker
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 19:38
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 19:38
43 lines
2786 bytes
2786 bytes
In article <26165@oasys.dt.navy.mil> curt@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Curt Welch) writes: > Trademark. As far as I know, all you have to do to get a trademark status > is to use it commercially. If you what to get it registered (so you can > put the r in a circle after your trademark, then you have to fill out some > paperwork. > > And the only protection you get is that other companies in the same business > can't use the same trademark. (i.e. that can't do something that would make > thier customers think they were buying your product.) The name of a T.V. > show would never be confused with a computer operating system, so there > is no problem with them using the nextstep name. > > Curt Welch This is starting to get off of the c.s.n train, but I'd like to point out that the trademark question at issue here is not as simple as Curt makes it out to be. Courts, in evaluating claims of trademark infringement also look to the likelihood that the public as a whole will assume an affiliation that does not exist. For example, don't think for one minute that just because the name of a soda product could not be confused with an television show, that the show could call itself "The Coca Cola Show". People seeing that name would assume some affiliation with the Coca Cola soft drink company, and such a use would almost certainly be actionable by Coca Cola. There exists a littany of case law in which large companies have enjoined such dissimilar uses of their trademarks (Tiffany, Rolex, Rolls Royce, Coke, Disney, etc.) Now it is true that the NeXT trademark is not quite as strong in the minds of the consuming public as the CocaCola TM, but NeXT is a high technology product, and the show is about high-technology. It could at least be argued that a consumer looking in the TV listings and seeing the name 'nextstep' on a TV show might think that the show was somehow affiliated with NeXT. There is probably no reason that NeXT would want to go after and enjoin this use, and no clear indication that they would win, but they would certainly have a shot. matt -- matt stecker | This is my NeXT Computer NeXT Campus Consultant, | There are many like it, UNC School of Law | but this one is mine.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct8.193847.1022@mattcube>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!cass.ma02.bull.com!think.com!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!gatech!concert!mattcube!mattReferences:
<26165@oasys.dt.navy.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!cass.ma02.bull.com!think.com!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!gatech!concert!mattcube!matt From: matt%mattcube@mcnc.org (Matthew M. Stecker) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: _nextstep_ television show! Message-ID: <1992Oct8.193847.1022@mattcube> Date: 8 Oct 92 19:38:47 GMT References: <26165@oasys.dt.navy.mil> Sender: matt@mattcube Reply-To: matt%mattcube@mcnc.org Organization: UNC School of Law, CC for NeXT Computer, Inc. Lines: 43