Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #2856Re: What causes the GUI's slowness under 3.0?
From: Doug DeJulio
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 14:37
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 14:37
12 lines
1134 bytes
1134 bytes
In article <1992Oct9.032553.26343@eng.ufl.edu> pgriffin@uful07.phys.ufl.edu (Paul A. Griffin) writes: >c. If it is a bug, is there a simple fix that an end user, or system >administator can implement? Does NeXT plan on releasing the bug fix >before 3.1 arrives? Yes, I think so. Boot with more buffers. This makes a HUGE difference. Before increasing the number of buffers, my NeXTstation mono (25MHz) cralwed with 3.0. Now it doesn't seem like it's slower than 2.1 to me (subjective, might be because of the way I use it). -- Doug DeJulio ddj+@cmu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BvuzAH.9s.2@cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!ddjReferences:
<5357@rosie.NeXT.COM> <5361@rosie.NeXT.COM> <1992Oct9.032553.26343@eng.ufl.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!ddj From: ddj+@cs.cmu.edu (Doug DeJulio) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: What causes the GUI's slowness under 3.0? Keywords: 3.0 Message-ID: <BvuzAH.9s.2@cs.cmu.edu> Date: 9 Oct 92 14:37:28 GMT Article-I.D.: cs.BvuzAH.9s.2 References: <5357@rosie.NeXT.COM> <5361@rosie.NeXT.COM> <1992Oct9.032553.26343@eng.ufl.edu> Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System) Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Lines: 12 Nntp-Posting-Host: itc.cs.cmu.edu