Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3059Re: Performance comparison with SUN
From: Curtis Johnson
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 15:48
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 15:48
32 lines
1972 bytes
1972 bytes
In article <1992Oct13.153938.19926@yang.earlham.edu> writes: # OK, I know that this has been trodden through before, but I'd like some numbers # # (or a number) comparing the performance of a turbo color NeXTstation (or # NextDimension) with a Sun 10. I have a poor misguided faculty type person who # can just about handle System 7 but who is desparate for the most powerful # machine in the Universe. No amount of reasoning can persuade him that what he # gains in program execution time he will definitely lose in system # administration time. So what I need to know is, approximately how many # Meaningless Indicators of Performance (MIPS) does the NeXT turbo generate # compared with a mighty Sun 10 (or whatever)? The Sparc 10 is a much more powerful machine, but the power/$cost ratio is far too high. For the most powerful Sparc 10, you could easily pay over $120,000 (based on articles in unixworld). Also sys admin time is also a ratio that is too high. If this poor misguided faculty person can deal with an average speed machine, 25mips I believe, then I would go with the $10,000 NeXT as opposed to the $100,000 Sparc 10. Just my $0.02. -- Curtis A. Johnson --------------------------------------------------------------------- Curtis A. Johnson |"The best thing a man can do for his culture curtis@accnxt1.tamu.edu | when he is rich is to endeavour to carry NeXTmail accepted | out those schemes which he entertained when
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct14.154832.23553@tamsun.tamu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!stanford.edu!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!newsReferences:
<1992Oct13.153938.19926@yang.earlham.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!kithrup!stanford.edu!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!news From: curtis@accnxt1.tamu.edu (Curtis Johnson) Subject: Re: Performance comparison with SUN Message-ID: <1992Oct14.154832.23553@tamsun.tamu.edu> Sender: news@tamsun.tamu.edu (Read News) Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station References: <1992Oct13.153938.19926@yang.earlham.edu> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 15:48:32 GMT Lines: 32