Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3155Re: IconBuilder: A [harsh] commentary - was Re: Icon, or equivalent under 3.0
From: Don Yacktman
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 16:17
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 16:17
20 lines
1296 bytes
1296 bytes
In article <1992Oct30.023933.29607@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>, coco@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (felix.lugo) writes: >In article <1992Oct29.231421.2656@hot.com> Robert_La_Ferla@hot.com writes: >| In article <1992Oct27.164010.9568@wuecl.wustl.edu> brian@wucs1.wustl.edu >| (Brian) writes: >| >I am extremely disappointed with IconBuilder. >| >| Ditto. >| >| Robert La Ferla > > Why don't you guys use the 2.1 Icon.app demo. I've been using it >(and Scene) for several weeks now and it's as BAD in 3.0 as it was in >2.1, but it's not any worse!!!! On my machine, they're both rendered useless. Scene dies whenever I try to load an image and Icon barfs when I try to save. Figures. Later, -don
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<d^#@byu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!news.byu.edu!newsReferences:
<1992Oct27.164010.9568@wuecl.wustl.edu> <1992Oct29.231421.2656@hot.com> <1992Oct30.023933.29607@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Nntp-Posting-Host: alaska.et.byu.edu Lines: 20 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!news.byu.edu!news Message-ID: <d^#@byu.edu> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 92 09:17:16 MST From: yackd@alaska.et.byu.edu (Don Yacktman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Distribution: world References: <1992Oct27.164010.9568@wuecl.wustl.edu> <1992Oct29.231421.2656@hot.com> <1992Oct30.023933.29607@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> Organization: Brigham Young University, Provo UT USA Subject: Re: IconBuilder: A [harsh] commentary - was Re: Icon, or equivalent under 3.0