Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3356Re: New SUN's, Bad news for NeXT?
From: Glenn Brown
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 07:04
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 07:04
20 lines
1050 bytes
1050 bytes
> Processor microSPARC ( tsunami I believe ) > Clock speed 50 Mhz > SPECint 92 26.4 > SPECfp 92 21.0 > SPECrate int 92 626 > SPECrate fp 92 498.1 > MIPS/MFLOPS 59.1 / 4.6 > Main Memory 16 - 96 > Sbus slots 2 > 16 M Ram > 15" color monitor ( 1024 x 768 ) 100 DPI > 207 MB disk > $4295 ( with discounts for quantity ) All the more reason for NeXT to port NeXTstep to the sparcs. It's really not the machine I care about. It's the OS and windowing system, of course. You can always paint the sparc black. =-) --Glenn
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov12.070431.349@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!nobodyReferences:
<1059@esosun.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!nobody From: gbrown@raven.ctr.columbia.edu (Glenn Brown) Subject: Re: New SUN's, Bad news for NeXT? References: <1059@esosun.UUCP> Sender: nobody@ctr.columbia.edu Organization: J. Random Misconfigured Site Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 07:04:31 GMT Message-ID: <1992Nov12.070431.349@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> X-Posted-From: raven.ctr.columbia.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu Lines: 20