Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3369Re: New SUN's, Bad news for NeXT?
From: felix.lugo
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:11
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:11
41 lines
1889 bytes
1889 bytes
In article <1059@esosun.UUCP> zeke@esosun.css.gov.UUCP () writes: | | These numbers are for the classic and the station which seem to be the same | system except for the color option. The base config for the clasic is as | follows, | | | 16 M Ram | 15" color monitor ( 1024 x 768 ) 100 DPI | 207 MB disk | $4295 ( with discounts for quantity ) | | | and for the station LX | | 16 M Ram | 16" color monitor ( a few configs ) | 42 NB disk | ISDN on motherboard | $7995 | | | Add to this Tbase10 ( no thicknet ) and 10MB/sec SCSI 2 and you have a pretty | tidy package. I had a chance to play with a station LX at the demo at UCSD | and it seemed real peppy, I neglected to see how huch memory as in it though. | | Is this good news or bad news for NeXT? I don't see how it could be good news. It's VERY bad news for NeXT hardware! No news for NeXTSTEP (except, whatever happens to NeXT hardware would directly affect NeXTSTEP since they're directly linked until NeXTSTEP486 is available). When are the above systems going to be ready? Maybe this is a good time for NeXT to re-evaluate their hardware strategy and decide which future they should follow: a software ONLY future, with NeXTSTEP as it's flagship product ported to different platforms (i.e., Suns, SGI, etc.), or continue their current trend with their hardware as their primary source of revenue (not to mention Steve Jobs payoffs)! --Felix
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov12.161144.9538@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!cocoReferences:
<1059@esosun.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!coco From: coco@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (felix.lugo) Subject: Re: New SUN's, Bad news for NeXT? Organization: AT&T Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:11:44 GMT Message-ID: <1992Nov12.161144.9538@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> References: <1059@esosun.UUCP> Lines: 42