Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3377re: New SUN's, Bad news for NeXT?
From: Mark Crispin
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 19:30
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 19:30
40 lines
3037 bytes
3037 bytes
I think I said, about two years ago, that NeXT has to decide whether it is a hardware company or a software company. NeXT's policy was to lock its customer base into a single hardware and software platform. You could not run NeXTSTEP on anything other than a NeXT computer, and you couldn't run anything other than NeXTSTEP on a NeXT computer. NeXT made a step in the right direction with NeXTSTEP/486, but IMHO going after the NT juggernaut is more for public relations than for profitability. NeXTSTEP/486 is simply too expensive and the market perception of NeXT as a company compared to Microsoft does not support a serious competition. NeXT has still not done anything about the ``you can't run anything other than NeXTSTEP on a NeXT computer'' problem. Screams of ``why would you want to do this'' aside, the fact is that NeXT withholds programming documentation about its hardware. Porting or developing an alterate operating system to NeXT hardware is not feasible. This all was very much in the 1980's idiom. Every major vendor did this, and are now backtracking. DEC has announced with Alpha that ``DEC will sell whatever the customer wants to buy'' without insisting that the customer buy what he doesn't want. They'll sell software (including sources) without requiring hardware purchases, and they'll sell hardware (down to the chip level) without requiring software purchases. DEC recently gave away a very impressive freeware CD-ROM, including a nice ``install to hard disk'' feature that just builds the directory structure and symbolic links to the actual data (there was supposed to be this in NeXTSTEP 3.0, but I didn't see it). What's more, DEC's freeware CD-ROM includes sources; although they supply binaries for RISC/Ultrix everything is designed so you can easily rebuild on your own local platform. There's a lot of good stuff on it. Best yet, DEC's freeware CD-ROM is free. NeXT charges you for their advertising; consider the $25 fee for the ``educational software'' CD-ROM and the fees for the videotapes of the Steve Jobs dog&pony roadshows. It's like paying for a NeXT T-shirt -- *why* would anyone want to pay to advertise a company's product? I hope NeXT sees the light. NeXT is behaving a lot better than they were two years ago, but there's still a long way to go. Somehow, going up again SUN -- a vendor which is justifiably hated by lots of people -- doesn't inspire much confidence.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MS-C.721596652.1103527590.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!mips2!cass.ma02.bull.com!think.com!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!mips2!cass.ma02.bull.com!think.com!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!news From: mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM (Mark Crispin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: re: New SUN's, Bad news for NeXT? Message-ID: <MS-C.721596652.1103527590.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM> Date: 12 Nov 92 19:30:52 GMT Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System) Organization: University of Washington Lines: 40 In-Reply-To: <1059@esosun.UUCP> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mime-Version: 1.0