Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3391Re: New SUN's, Bad news for NeXT?
From: james dehnert
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 02:05
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 02:05
52 lines
2742 bytes
2742 bytes
- > Processor microSPARC ( tsunami I believe ) - > Clock speed 50 Mhz - > SPECint 92 26.4 - > SPECfp 92 21.0 - > SPECrate int 92 626 - > SPECrate fp 92 498.1 - > MIPS/MFLOPS 59.1 / 4.6 - > Main Memory 16 - 96 - > Sbus slots 2 - > 16 M Ram - > 15" color monitor ( 1024 x 768 ) 100 DPI - > 207 MB disk - > $4295 ( with discounts for quantity ) In article <1992Nov12.070431.349@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> gbrown@raven.ctr.columbia.edu (Glenn Brown) writes: - - - All the more reason for NeXT to port NeXTstep to the sparcs. - It's really not the machine I care about. It's the OS and windowing - system, of course. You can always paint the sparc black. =-) - - --Glenn - In article <1992Nov12.070054.2742@uwasa.fi> hv@uwasa.fi (Harri Valkama) writes: - Hmm, I have Sun Sparcstation IPX here at university and NeXTstations - at my own company. Comparing these two machines: I think Sun is pretty - boring to use. Those specs above looks like they have a fast machine - but if I have to choose between NeXT and Sun I would take NeXT. - - I value the Operating System (or should I say the Operating Environ- - ment) more and more I use my NeXT. I agree with both of your statements here, but one thing that these computers are going to do is make VERY big inroads in the academic markets, among other places. These are low cost, fast, SUNs. Just hook em up and configure em in the network like any other SUNs you have. I know NeXT's integrate well but there are still problems to work out. If you buy more SUNs for your existing SUN network you shouldn't ( notice i say shouldn't ) have any of those problems. I know at UCSD there are profs who just won't consider the NeXT for whatever stupid reason. They go with 486's because SUNs have been too expensive, until now. Time will tell here. Lets hope NeXT dosen't stay too quiet too long. Zeke -- +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ =+ += Eschew Obfuscation Next Mail Welcome =+ += += =+ James "Zeke" Dehnert zeke@znext.cts.com += =+ =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov13.020535.5122@znext.cts.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!nosc!crash!znext!zekeReferences:
<1992Nov12.070431.349@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!nosc!crash!znext!zeke From: zeke@znext (james dehnert) Subject: Re: New SUN's, Bad news for NeXT? Message-ID: <1992Nov13.020535.5122@znext.cts.com> Sender: zeke@znext.cts.com (james dehnert) Organization: pnet References: <1992Nov12.070431.349@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 02:05:35 GMT Lines: 52