Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3539Re: Adobe/Sun Announce
From: Scott Byer
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 16:23
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 16:23
40 lines
2547 bytes
2547 bytes
Geoff Brunkhorst writes > That's not how I remember it. The extension has to be supported on > both sides of the 'wire'. I run into a lot of "extension not supported > on server" error messages when running DEC's DPS stuff on an Xterm. > Granted that is some bastardized X11R[3,4] that DEC is using, not R5. You've missed the press release about DPS NX, then :-). The DPS NX system is an 'agent' - a third process which will take your PostScript and send the correct X protocol to the server for you. Then, the X server you are talking to does not need the extension integration. Yes, there are performance issues. But if you cared about that small difference in performance, you probably wouldn't have bought X terminals in the first place. Best part is, the Display PostScript client library already knows how to talk to an agent for you - your application speaks on API, and doesn't have to care if the server has Display PostScript as an extension as long as a DPS NX agent is or can be running on your network. > Also, Sun, et al, has to start selling systems to end users. Ever > notice how hard it is to change the font size on an xterm window? > Mere mortals can't do it. A lot of NeXT's selling points to the > common end user is the ability to switch fonts on the fly on apps > like Stuart and Terminal and Mail (a lot of blind people use computer > nowadays). Display Postscript will not sell the soap, until the > development environment makes it too easy not to incorporate easy > to use functionality. Well, cheesy apps that don't care about typography can use ATM undex X (or the other scalable rasterizers). If you care about typography, you're going to speak PostScript anyway. -- Scott Byer NeXTMail: byer@mv.us.adobe.com Adobe Systems Incorporated These are *my* opinions, and 1585 Charleston Road, P.O. Box 7900 do not necessarily reflect Mountain View, CA 94039-7900 the opinions of my employer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep29.162341.25621@adobe.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!cass.ma02.bull.com!think.com!ames!decwrl!adobe!usenetReferences:
<1992Sep28.212929.12006@bmw.mayo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!know!cass.ma02.bull.com!think.com!ames!decwrl!adobe!usenet From: byer@adobe.com (Scott Byer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Subject: Re: Adobe/Sun Announce Message-ID: <1992Sep29.162341.25621@adobe.com> Date: 29 Sep 92 16:23:41 GMT References: <1992Sep28.212929.12006@bmw.mayo.edu> Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS) Reply-To: byer@adobe.com (Scott Byer) Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated Lines: 40