Article View: comp.sys.next.misc
Article #3675Re: NeXT habits creates hesitant market (was: Re: The New NeXT Keyboard)
From: Andrew T Duchowski
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 17:15
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 17:15
61 lines
3666 bytes
3666 bytes
In article <BvH1nt.Lz8@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens) writes: >Scott Turner writes >> NeXT would seem to be making some bad "loyalty pays" moves this year. > >This year? Don't forget the ND (which came out a couple years ago, I think) >that has not been upgraded, refunded (or recalled), and nothing by NeXT has >been made to get any hardware compression on that beast. NeXT won't even let >out what that mystical expansion port does (is it still on there?) > >More and more with NeXT, I get the feeling that the more new stuff NeXT might >bring to market the more they'll see a series of hesitant buyers. For myself, >I am now very hesitant to jump on new offerings by NeXT only because they >weren't so hesitant to screw the OD and ND buyers (and continue to screw recent >ND buyers). > >It's almost as if NeXT doesn't want us to buy certain things, yet they bring >them out anyways....jeez. Maybe it's time for NeXT to give Jobs the boot, like Apple did :) I don't know if it's him, but it seems like the company that he's with (until he's booted out) doesn't give a shit about backwards compatibility (ie. ND, OD in NeXT's case - not to mention 1.0->2.0->3.0 discrepancies that seem to come out of the woodwork). I haven't worked on Mac's or PC's that much, so I wonder if they have the same kind of upgrade problems. (I minimally administer a DECstation and an SGI iris - both are easy to upgrade and I haven't run across many problems. On the DEC, the only different thing I can recall on one of their updates was a new C compiler which conformed to ANSI standards. Only a plus though if you ask me). Plus, I really don't know that much about Job's influence into company decision and if he really causes the problems that seem to produce many disgruntled users. I personally own a NeXT and love the thing to death. I have a cube and thought eventually of buying a ND and an external OD (the latter seems like an excellent removable media solution - why drop it? It should be encouraged so that we can grow closer to various multimedia advancements), but now I'm not so sure about the ND.... I'm still considering an OD for personal use - unfortunately I expect nothing 'neat' for the OD to come out from NeXT. Anyway, no flames please about any of the above. I may totally be misinformed and Jobs may totally be the smartest dude out there and NeXT the best company around. Personally I can't really complain that much except for the high prices of things (the only problem of getting a unix box I guess), and the fear of being forgotten by NeXT in terms of backwards compatibility - last scary rumor I heard was that they're going to forget all about the cubes...that would be unpleasant to say the least. There's my $0.02 - don't flame me, don't even email me about this. These are just some personal thoughts and observations - all usual disclaimers apply. "This is nobody's official document" Andrew. -- -- Andrew Duchowski -- Texas A&M University -- andrewd@cs.tamu.edu (non-NeXT mail) -- andrewd@visual2.cs.tamu.edu (NeXT mail)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct2.171536.11284@tamsun.tamu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!andrewdReferences:
<1992Oct1.031010.8055@gagetalker.com> <BvH1nt.Lz8@news.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!andrewd From: andrewd@tamsun.tamu.edu (Andrew T Duchowski) Subject: Re: NeXT habits creates hesitant market (was: Re: The New NeXT Keyboard) Message-ID: <1992Oct2.171536.11284@tamsun.tamu.edu> Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station References: <1992Oct1.031010.8055@gagetalker.com> <BvH1nt.Lz8@news.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:15:36 GMT Lines: 61